spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Spits] Non Triumph, rear disc brake question -

To: <r.gosling@penspen.com>, <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [Spits] Non Triumph, rear disc brake question -
From: <Mackmi@usa.redcross.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:54:45 -0400
The only thing that might be a reason for the rear caliper placement, is
the routing of the emergency brake cable.  This is just speculation, but
if I was designing where to put the rear caliper, I would place it where
the least chance of binding the emergency cable or brake hose was.
Mike Mack
79Spit, 70 GT6, 74 VW Thing, 90 5.0 Mustang

-----Original Message-----
From: spitfires-bounces+mackmi=usa.redcross.org@autox.team.net
[mailto:spitfires-bounces+mackmi=usa.redcross.org@autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of Gosling, Richard
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:35 AM
To: v6spitfireguy@cox.net
Cc: spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Spits] Non Triumph, rear disc brake question -

For a moment I wondered about the vertical forces - a caliper at the
3-o-clock position will be pushed up when braking, and one and the
9-o-clock position will be pushed down.  But then there will be an equal
and opposite force on the brake disc, transferred to the axle, and since
both the axle and the caliper are supported by the hub the two forces
will cancel out there and not make it into the rest of the vehicle.

So, no, I can't think of any good reason why the rear calipers should be
in the opposite position to the fronts.


Richard

________________________________________________________________________
This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be
privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender
by
return E-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised
use
or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly
prohibited.
Please note that E-mails are susceptible to change.
The Penspen Group shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete
transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for
any
delay in its receipt or damage to your system. The Penspen Group does
not
guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained
or that
this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference.
The following UK companies within the Penspen Group and any electronic
communication sent on behalf of any of them, are subject to the
provisions of
the UK Companies Act 1985;
PENSPEN HOLDINGS LIMITED (Company Number : 980600) Registered Office: 3
Water
Lane, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1TJ Registered in England and Wales (VAT No;
239
7770 19)
PENSPEN LIMITED (Company Number: 584446) Registered Office: 3 Water
Lane,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1TJ Registered in England and Wales (VAT No; 239
7770
19)
(Unipen, Penspen Integrity and Andrew Palmer & Associates are operating
divisions of Penspen Limited and Spencer & Partners and Pencol are trade
names
of Penspen Limited)
MANCHESTER JETLINE LIMITED (Company Number: 2392093) Registered Office:
3
Water Lane, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1TJ Registered in England and Wales
(VAT No;
537 8635 08)
Spitfires@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spitfires

http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

Spitfires@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spitfires

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>