spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stripped oil sump bolt threads in aluminum filler piece at

To: Nick Moseley <nmoseley@dccnet.com>
Subject: Re: Stripped oil sump bolt threads in aluminum filler piece at
From: Larry Vaughan <ljvaughan@pldi.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:57:15 -0500
I bought one of the steel reproductions, but have not needed it yet. The 
    dude selling them said he was working on a replacement for the wood 
wedges. I pulled some leather seals that looked better than the fake 
rubber ones, so wood may be hard to beat.

Larry

Nick Moseley wrote:
> Apologies for the cross-posting.
> 
>  
> 
> In the continuing saga of the engine purchased at a good price, fully
> rebuilt, I checked main bearings and they were indeed brand new. Ahh, that's
> nice.
> 
> However, the threads into the aluminum block called a "filler piece", at the
> front of the engine holding the two front sump (oil pan) bolts, are well and
> truly stripped.
> 
>  
> 
> As I understand it, the options are:
> 
> -helicoil to replace the threads, means added expense of a helicoil kit,
> plus the (very real) possibility that I'd drill the new holes at an angle
> 
> -new aluminum block, but I recall this coming up before, so it must be a
> weak point
> 
> -new metal (instead of aluminum) block (filler piece), I remember seeing
> these on e-bay in the past, but can't find them lately. Anyone know the
> seller?
> 
>  
> 
> Any preferences? One misgiving about the metal block relates to why Triumph
> would use aluminum in the first place if it didn't need it, but there is not
> always a rhyme to their reason.
> 
>  
> 
> Comments welcome.
> 
>  
> 
> Nick Moseley
> 
> Vancouver B.C.
> 
> (NASS #278) 


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>