My motivation is that I have to replace my existing exhaust manifold;
I'm not specifically looking for a performance improvement. Of course,
if improved performance comes along as part of the deal, that's great
(and it IS a part of why I'm exploring the options in some detail). If
the Pacesetter is in fact a suitable option, it's also likely to be much
less expensive than just putting in another cast iron manifold ... which
is a big plus.
Thanks,
Paul.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ptegler [mailto:ptegler@gouldfo.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 7:32 AM
> To: Joe Curry; Paul Fjelstad
> Cc: spitfires@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Headers - no problems here
>
>
> As Joe mentioned, I too have yet to find a
> unit that didn't bolt right up and fit correctly.
> The 4-into-1 Pacesetter is better for higher rpm range
> where as the 4-2-1 is better at mid range.
> The average driver out there wouldn't be able to tell
> one way or another when compared to the stock
> manifold. Both would seem to perform better than
> the stock setup (I don't know how much is real
> performance or mentally, by desire.. a perceived
> increase in performance)
>
> Either way you go, get them hot coated.
> They'll last MUCH longer and look a lot better
> a year from now as compared to not coating them.
>
> Paul Tegler ptegler@gouldfo.com www.teglerizer.com
///
/// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe spitfires
///
///
|