spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LRP

To: Spit List <spitfires@autox.team.net>, "'Suzie'" <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: LRP
From: "Banbury, Terrence" <Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 15:49:26 -0400
Does this have implications for those of us in the U.S. using lead
substitutes?

> ----------
> From:         Suzie[SMTP:suzie_bear@hotmail.com]
> Reply To:     Suzie
> Sent:         Wednesday, May 17, 2000 3:08 PM
> To:   Spit List
> Subject:      Fw: LRP
> 
> 
> Another one from Richard while he still can't post to the list
> Suzie
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard B Gosling <Gosling_Richard_B@perkins.com>
> To: suzie_bear <suzie_bear@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 1:30 PM
> Subject: LRP
> 
> 
> > Suzie,
> >
> > As I mentioned before, I do not seem to be able to send e-mails directly
> to the
> >  list - no idea why, but there it is.  Could you do me a favour and
> forward
> >  this on for everyone's benefit?  Thanks!
> >
> >
> > This news item appears in this months 'Club Torque' (newsletter of Club
> >  Triumph), and is likely to be of interest to many, particularly in
> Europe.
> >
> > Quiller Triumph - Some Thoughts on LRP
> > Julian McHale of Quiller has told me that several of their customers
> using
> LRP
> >  type fuel have complained of a smell of petrol but were unable to find
> any
> >  obvious fuel leak.  Upon investigation Quiller found disintigrating
> rubber
> >  connections and decided to carry out an experiment using fuel from a
> major oil
> >  company.  They filled three jam jars with unleaded, 4-star leaded and
> LRP,
> >  inserted off-cuts of new rubber hose and left them for a week.  Upon
> >  examination the offcuts in the unleaded and leaded fuel remained
> intact,
> but
> >  that in the LRP had become a messy gunge!  It was quite unusable as a
> hose.
> >  Apparently the thin diaphragms in Stromberg carburettors are
> particularly
> >  vulnerable to this type of attack.  Julian suggests that members using
> LRP
> >  might like to think about this of even try the jam jar test at home!
> >
> > They won't admit to whose LRP they tried, and different companies use
> different
> >  additives so they might not all be so bad, but this is worrying stuff!
> They
> >  also didn't try any of the in-tank additives.  However, for those using
> LRP or
> >  in-tank additives this is a surprising worry - if my car was not
> converted to
> >  run on unleaded I certainly would be testing my choice of additive
> tonight!
> >
> > Richard Gosling and Daffy (no lead, no additives, no problem!)
> >
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Fw: LRP, Suzie
    • RE: LRP, Banbury, Terrence <=
    • LRP, OHFASTONE