To: | spitfires@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Smog Woes (Longish) |
From: | Reed Mideke <rmideke@interbase.com> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 1999 09:22:29 -0700 |
No. ... Unless swap the comm # along with the motor ;-(. But that's probably only legal if you use the tub. Now you know why unrusted late model spits get crushed every day in this state. Tom Ambrose wrote: > > As another Michigander who might end up in California, I wonder if replacing > your late 70s engine with one manufactured previous to '74 might qualify for > an exemption. One nice thing about Spits is the ease of changing engines. > > Tom > -- Reed Mideke rmideke@interbase.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Smog Woes (Longish), Tom Ambrose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Smog Woes (Longish), Barry Schwartz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Smog Woes (Longish), Tom Ambrose |
Next by Thread: | Re: Smog Woes (Longish), Barry Schwartz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |