oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [oletrucks] RE: IFS, but not to open any can or worms again

To: Whittaker Bill G Civ ASC/SMY <Bill.Whittaker@wpafb.af.mil>
Subject: RE: [oletrucks] RE: IFS, but not to open any can or worms again
From: "A.B." <bigfred@unm.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 12:51:38 -0600 (MDT)
-- Cool.

> 
> OK, I'll say it again.  The vast majority of bolt on aftermarket IFS systems 
>designed by small entrepreneures can be made safer if welded in place.  I 
>don't believe there are very many mechanical engineers that would take issue 
>with that statement.  This is not to say that a small company can't design one 
>that's safe.  But bolt on IFS systems just aren't as safe as they can be when 
>installed on an old frame unless they're welded in place.  
> 
> The Pacer unit is a different animal.  It was produced by a major auto 
>manufacturer and is a proven design.  If installed correctly (properly 
>aligned) the geometry will be correct and this system represents a good 
>alternative to the Mustang II kits.  Would I use one without welding it in 
>place?  In a word, no.  Welding will add safety simply because, although it 
>was designed as a bolt in system for the Pacer, it was not designed to be a 
>bolt in system for an old truck with a frame that reacts differently to stress 
>than the one it was designed for. 
> 
> I honestly don't think I can state my position any plainer than that. 
> 
> Bill Whittaker
> '53 3100 Hemi
> Built Like A Rock 
> With Mopar Stock
> 
> 
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
> 

oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>