There were two sizes journals.
2.153 and 2.030, also the journals on the front are larger to each of the ones
on the rear, for ease of installation.
Antonio,
Doug Pewterbaugh wrote:
> OK everybody, if the journals came in two sizes, I either get lucky & they
> match (large or small); the cam is large & the block is small (don't have
> access to measure), in which case, can I line bore the block?; or the cam is
> small & the block is large, in which case I'll have a cam paper weight.
> Does anybody know if the larger journals were the later trend or the early
> trend on the 235 powerglide designs?
>
> Regards,
> Doug Pewterbaugh
> dpewter@msn.com
> Denton, TX
> 49 3104 216 5-Window
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Galbraith <trks@javanet.com>
> To: Doug Pewterbaugh <dpewter@email.msn.com>
> Cc: oletrucks list <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
> Date: Tuesday, May 25, 1999 11:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [oletrucks] 235 powerglide camshaft
>
> >I believe the '54 block came with big and small cam journals. You have to
> >measure the block to see which it has.
> >
> >Grant 50 3100
> >
> >Doug Pewterbaugh wrote:
> >
> >> I have located a 235 powerglide camshaft that states it fits '59-60. I
> >> don't have a part number, but need to know if it will fit in a '54
> >> powerglide engine...any differences?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Doug Pewterbaugh
> >> dpewter@msn.com
> >> Denton, TX
> >> 49 3104 216 5-Window
> >>
> >> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
> >
> >
> >
>
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|