morgans
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: low riders

To: LanceKL@aol.com
Subject: Re: low riders
From: "Robert K. Alexander" <ralex@unm.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 22:06:08 -0800 (PST)
Axles are all above the frame rails, gents.  Think of the arch in the 
frame that would be required if axles were below the frame - major 
re-engineering here a la Detroit.  Not Morganesque.

Bob Alexander

On Tue, 28 Oct 1997 LanceKL@aol.com wrote:

> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 18:12:47 -0500 (EST)
> From: LanceKL@aol.com
> To: zehrinwa@UMDNJ.EDU, morgans@Autox.Team.Net
> Subject: Re: low riders
> 
> In a message dated 97-10-28 17:41:34 EST, zehrinwa@UMDNJ.EDU writes:
> 
> << In regards to Joe DeLuca's comments in the 4/4 vrs. +4 issue: correct me
> if
>  I'm wrong but...  The lower stance of the 4/4 is due, in part, to the
>  placement of the rear axle ABOVE the frame rails (allowed, I gather from
>  Joe, because the ford mill is shorter than the TR mill).  Is this true?  Is
>  the rear axle on the typical +4 located underneath the frame rails?  I >>
> 
> I have never seen a morgan with the rear axle below the frame rails.
> 
> Lance K. Lipscomb
> 81 Plus 8 - axle definately above the frame rails.
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>