Re: [Mgs] MG6 Review

[Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>]

I'm not inspired.  --  CR

On 3/20/2011 9:17 AM, Paul Hunt wrote:
> http://www.mg-rover.org/articles/1/1097/mg6_road_test_review/index.htm?
>
> I have been expecting that because SAIC can't use the Rover name the MG6 is
> really going to be more like a Rover than an MG, as MG saloons have always
> been performance versions of the Rover variant.  This review does seem to
> confirm that, although because a number of aspects of the design particularly
> the handling have been done at Longbridge and not China the end result is
> somewhere between what one might expect of an MG had the company had both
> names.  Having seen it in the 'flesh' I was surprised how good the rear 3/4
> view looked (especially view 12) as it's where so many designers run out of
> inspiration, not unlike a performance Merc (which may on may not be a good
> thing).  Less so the front, which is pretty generic (indeed similar to the new
> Honda Accord) and has no trace at all of the MG grille which has always been
> the case previously.
>
> PaulH.
> _______________________________________________
>
> Mgs@autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation  $12.75
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/ccrobins@ktc.com
_______________________________________________

Mgs@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums