To: | "'MG List'" <mgs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Mgs] OIL |
From: | "Stephen West-Fisher" <steve@coastaldatasystems.com> |
Date: | Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:47:32 -0400 |
If you look at the amount of zinc in modern formulations as compared to that in the 50's, you will find they are about the same. Zinc in oil started rising in the late 60's, I don't recall the reason but I doubt it was due to flat tappets. My own take on the problems a few people started having has more to do with modern "offshore" metallurgy or the number of overhauls the cams have survived. -- Stephen West-Fisher Coastal Data Systems 727.831.1142 http://www.coastaldatasystems.com/ -----Original Message----- From: mgs-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:mgs-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Paul Hunt Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 4:16 AM To: Max Heim; MG List Subject: Re: [Mgs] OIL Both API and ACEA specifications include limits for levels of zinc and phosphorus: http://www.acea.be/images/uploads/pub/070308_ACEA_sequences_2007_LD_and_HD.p df http://www.api.org/certifications/engineoil/pubs/upload/150916thAdd10308forp rint-2.pdf I've seen (but can't now find) a statement that from some official body that modern formulations don't cause accelerated wear in older engines - not that I believed it given the amount of empirical evidence to the contrary. _______________________________________________ Mgs@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Suggested annual donation $12.75 Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Mgs] OIL, now Cats, Bert Palte |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Mgs] OIL, Max Heim |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] OIL, Dan DiBiase |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] OIL, Max Heim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |