| To: | "Councill, David" <dcouncill@msubillings.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE! |
| From: | Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:46:22 -0500 |
Darn, I didn't think of the earlier Bs. OK guys, I sit corrected.
Thanks,
CR
Councill, David wrote:
> I thought the reason for the dual master cylinder was redundancy so that
> a rear or front brake failure would not end in total brake failure. This
> was a USA mandated safety standard. Mk1 Bs had a single master cylinder.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Brake trouble, mghirsch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE!, Hans Duinhoven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE!, Paul Hunt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Brake Trouble! UPDATE!, yd3 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |