mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: probably a repetitive topic...Slick 50

To: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: probably a repetitive topic...Slick 50
From: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 10:40:40 -0800
What condition is it that you are trying to improve (with Slick 50)? I cant'
say I'm familiar with its (purported) benefits.

on 3/20/02 6:34 AM, Bill Saidel at saidel@camden.rutgers.edu wrote:

> Springtime and oil change calls.
> 
> Oh learned mechanics, here is my question.
> 
> Putting synthetic in a 60,000 mile engine probably does not make sense.
> 20W-50 is the norm, but what about something like Slick 50. The engine has
> a 54,000 mile history that I don't know. It does mildly leak from the rear
> seal (although significantly less since I added some anonymous seal
> swelling additive). I don't want to pull the engine until I have to and
> would like to delay that as long as possible.
> 
> Is there any positive advantage or negative disadvantage to using an
> additive like Slick 50?
> 
> Bill
> '76B
> 


--

Max Heim
'66 MGB GHN3L76149
If you're near Mountain View, CA,
it's the primer red one with chrome wires

///
///  mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>