The majority of the internet is very broad and very shallow.
Barrie Robinson wrote:
> .......and here gentlemen we have the problem! Dave, I mean no destain on
> your remark but you mention "to make it look good". You see my point is
> that I am not looking for "look good" - I am looking for information and
> service. The most useful sites are those that use simple facilities and
> give you the info not the advertising and explosive graphics. Viewers on
> the web do not search for adverts they search for information.
>
>
>
> At 04:07 PM 3/12/02 +0100, David Hayes wrote:
>
>>But to put it from a web developers perspective (sonething I am from time to
>>time) it is a nightmare trying to support a website that looks the same in
>>the latest versions of Netscape, Internet Explorer and Opera etc without
>>having to worry about trying to make it look good in the last half a dozen
>>versions of each of these. Website authors typically have a choice between
>>creating
>>very basic (read dull) sites that work accross the board or picking a subset
>>of browsers to support and creating a nice site. If only the major browser
>>vendors could process HTML the same way...
>>Just my tuppence worth
>>Dave
>>
>>
>>>Right on, Barrie. I'm quite happy with Netscape 4.73 and I let the
>>>vendors know
>>>it. (This does relate to lbc parts.)
>>>
>>>Bud Krueger
>>>52TD
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
>>http://www.gmx.net
>>
>
> Regards
> Barrie
>
> Barrie Robinson - barrier@bconnex.net
--
Paul T. Root E/Mail: proot@iaces.com
600 Stinson Blvd, Fl 1S PAG: +1 (877) 693-7155
Minneapolis, MN 55413 WRK: +1 (612) 664-3385
NIC: PTR FAX: +1 (612) 664-4779
///
/// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
|