Lets all pick on Bud!
This isn't a "sexist thread" (are you implying that the guys are the
sexists?)...
If I remember a few lines back, it was the gal who pulled the guy into the car!
Then, did I not read that she was on top of, and facing him? Or was that
someone's
fantasy? Sounds like a party to me!!!
Now, for you Michael Graziano; all 5'-11" and 200 lbs. of you. I recall someone
with your same name starting another sexist thread regarding a young lady
complaining about being kissed by a former roommate, yadda, yadda.
Was she the one you described, and I quote "Nope...... And top on (not hers)
...... Like I said, just uncomfortable. Better in a remote spot outside the
car."
Fascinating turn. Fascinating thread. Damn sight more exciting than bleeding
brakes.;-))
Jim
Albert F Jones wrote:
> No Bud,
>
> Not at all. It just seems to me that the more responses (this one
> included) that are made, the more is made of the subject. Ergo, treating
> it with the ******** that it deserves. We have all, at some time or
> another perhaps, had no interest in the subject matter of a posting. We
> all have a delete key. I am quite sure that not everyone is interested in
> some of my postings to the list, and opt to ignore them. That is what the
> list is all about isn't it? Those side trips that we often make. Some
> choose not to take the side road, and other choose to follow it. Perhaps
> the freedom to choose is paramount, and perhaps the choices that one makes
> signifies one's maturity.
>
> Just my own tuppence worth.
>
> Elizabeth
> Freely admitting that you canchoose to read this or not.
>
> At 08:30 PM 1/31/00 -0500, Bud Krueger wrote:
> >Something's not right here. A year or so ago, this sexist thread would have
> >elicited a fair number of comments by now from listers of the fair sex. Yet,
> >not a word. Have we lost the Nory's, Carol's, etc.? I hope not.
> >
> >Bud
> >
> >"Graziano, Michael" wrote:
> >
> >> Nope...... And top on (not hers) ...... And I'm 5'11" and 200 lbs.
> Like I
> >> said, just uncomfortable. Better in a remote spot outside the car.
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Brad Fornal [SMTP:toyman@htcomp.net]
> >> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 6:30 PM
> >> > To: Larry Macy
> >> > Cc: Charles D. Sorkin; Spridgets list; MG List
> >> > Subject: Re: MGA movie sighting
> >> >
> >> > IN A MIDGET!! You must be referring to merely Clintonizing, not the
> actual
> >> > deed.
> >> >
> >> > Larry Macy wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Like I said, on the Pass seat facing each other.
> >> > >
> >> > > Anonymous
> >> > >
> >> > > At this exact moment in time 1/31/00 12:53 PM, cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com
> >> > > made the profound statement:
> >> > >
> >> > > >On the bonnet? That's definitely cheating.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I mean inside, with the top up or down.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Regards,
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Charles
> >> > > >'74 Midget
> >> > > >'68 Sprite
> >> > > >cdsorkin@ix.netcom.com
> >> > > >Bloomfield, NJ
> >> > > >
> >> > > >P. S. Does this imply that (Non GT) LBC owners could have, on
> >> > average,
> >> > > >fewer children?
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
> >> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
> >> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
> >> If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
> >> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
> >> sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
> >> print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
> >> recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
> >> the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any
> >> views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
> >> where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
> >> them to be the views of any such entity.
> >
> >--
> >Bud Krueger
> >http://home.ici.net/~bkrueger/
> >52TD
> >77MGB
> >
> >
> >
> >
|