This is interesting,
So I'll put my 2 cents in. I've had 2 TR6's, both '72's. They were
both good runners and handled well, until the bushings on the rear trailing
arms went out on one, then it handled like a pig. The other had a typical
problem of leaky rear shock the bounced it's way around until fixed.
On the other hand, my MGB handles well, but then the suspension has been
rebuilt with all new bushings, and it has an uprated front sway bar.
As for acceleration, the TR does accelerate faster, but it has more
displacement and 2 more cylinders so it should, except that neither of mine
had overdrive, so they both red lined out while the MGB-GT was still pulling
away ( with overdrive...). I used to consistently leave my friend behind
in his TR with me in my BGT when they where both new on the twisty turnies
of east anglia in out younger days. Don't really know if it was the cars,
or lack of judgement.
You pays your money and takes your choice....
Harlan.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kai Radicke <mowogmg@pil.net>
To: chief bootknocker <mowog77@theglobe.com>; mgs@autox.team.net
<mgs@autox.team.net>
Date: Friday, April 09, 1999 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: My humble opinion(long) on Bs, C, and TR6s
>>76 TR6 NonO/D
>
>
>>The car looked excellent in Carmine red, started like it was new
>>and went not much faster than my B. when it hit a bump in the
>>road it rocked like a boat. It cornered like an El Dorado and in my
>>opinion deflated my bubble.
>
>
>I don't know how abused the TR6 that you rode in was, but I can say that
>type of handling is definitly not a typical TR6 trait! My TR6 has so
little
>body roll, it's thrilling. Hit a bump and the car gitters, and at very
high
>speeds it'll cause you to jump left or right a bit... but it doesn't rock
>like a boat. Perhaps the car you rode in didn't have a front antisway bar.
>
>>I had hoped it would be a faster car. It was only marginally faster
>>and didn't come close to my Bs handling capabilities.
>
>
>Again, I've had totally different experiences in my TR6. You can easily
>feel the extra power (versus the MGB) as you accelerate, I don't like
>passing fast moving large trucks on the hi-way in an MGB... it's a snap in
>my TR6. (I also don't have Overdrive) I often find myself doing more than
>the posted speed limit in my TR6, can't say that I've done that in an MGB.
>
>>My opinion: If you are like me (like the looks of a TR6 and want
>>some speed) save yourself some money and buy a B!! Bs outhandle
>>the Tr6 and are probably quicker off the line.
>
>
>I disagree with all aspects of that statement. The only advantage I think
>the MGB wins on is the structure of it's body. The monocoque body is far
>superior to the body and chassis setup of the TR6, IMHO. If you like the
>feel of collapsing your suspension on the MGB when making a 130 degree turn
>onto a hi-way onramp at 40mph then I'd said the MGB is for you. I have yet
>to try that in my TR6, but I have the feeling the rearend is gonna slide.
>
>In my case the TR6 was also a better buy then finding an MGB for the same
>price. But I was extremely luckly in finding a TR6 owned by an older
>gentleman that was selling it for a half of it's worth.
>
>
>>My opinion: I want one.
>
>
>What about the rice racer rockets? You know the four door Hondas with F1
>style wings and 18" wheels, and the car is lowered so that it scrapes the
>ground? ;-)
>
>>Conclusion: I love my 77 MGB!!!!
>
>
>I like both the MGB and the TR6, and I also own one of each; I don't think
>they are comparable. The MGB is like an oversize go cart, it is has a very
>high fun factor. The TR6, I think, is a much more comfortable and serious
>sportscar - but lacks the fun flavour of the MGB. Just the general lines
of
>the TR6 are so agresive when compared to the MGB's slopes and curves.
>
>>Erik.
>
>
>--
>Kai Radicke -- kai@radiohead.net
>1966 MGB -- 1974 Triumph TR6
>
>
|