mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: craftsman vs. metrinch

To: "MG List" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: craftsman vs. metrinch
From: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:40:42 -0800
"Aluminum" spanners??? Sure, they wouldn't rust but they'd ream 
themselves on the first rusty nut...

; )

>Nory writes:
>
>>BTW, I'm still using Craftsman wrenches that belonged
>>to my Dad.  Don't know exactly when he got them, but
>>he's been gone over 20 years, and the wrenches are
>>still in good shape.  I guess you can say they've held
>>up pretty well.  Even if the quality today isn't what
>>it once was, the guarantee still is.  They're still a
>>good value for the buck, IMHO.
>
>
>My tools are a combination of Craftsman, and lots of Husky stuff.  I have no
>preference, and they're both of excellent quality.  I got hooked on Husky,
>when Sears Hardware didn't have the tool I needed and I got the same tool,
>cheaper, at Home Depot (Husky brand).  Has a lifetime guarantee, and last I
>checked you could trade in your busted craftsman tool for a new husky
>replacement.
>
>That said, I have some old - 45+ years at least - Craftsman whitworth
>spanners and sockets.  The spanners are forged aluminum, and are still in
>excellent condition.  The sockets are scratched from use, but not rusted and
>the chrome still excellent on them.  An older neighbour said he kept these
>in his TC back in the early 50s... and I "inherited" them when he cleaned
>out his garage last year.
>
>I think for the home mechanic, Craftsman or any of the major tool brands you
>find at the hardware stores are acceptable.  Most never see the same kind of
>everyday abuse that happens in a shop.
>
>BTW, Metrinch is originally a "TV Brand" now sold everywhere... "as seen on
>TV."
>
>--
>Kai Radicke -- kai@radiohead.net
>1966 MGB -- 1974 Triumph TR6
>
>


--

Max Heim
'66 MGB
runs great, looks scabrous
mountain View CA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>