Yeouch!
Take a look over at mgs@autox.team.net. There are several women who
regularly drive &/or maintain old british cars.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Los <roger@los.com>
To: e-type@jag-lovers.org <e-type@jag-lovers.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 10, 1998 2:20 PM
Subject: RE: [E-Type] Calling Auckland New Zealand/humour
>OK, that's it, I'm moving to NZ. The local women, as a general rule (a)
have
>no idea what an E-Type is (b) aren't particularly anxious to find out and
>(c) would rather drive an SUV. In my experience, women generally prefer new
>cars of any stripe over nice old cars (to cast a sweeping sterotype).
>
>It couldn't possibly be me, now could it?
>
>Roger Los
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-e-type@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-e-type@jag-lovers.org]On
>> Behalf Of Mark Farnham
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 1998 2:23 AM
>> To: e-type@jag-lovers.org
>> Subject: Re: [E-Type] Calling Auckland New Zealand/humour
>>
>>
>> Hi There Grant,
>> I have owned my Etype for 14 months, the only two Etypes I have
>> seen on the
>> road in that time have been driven by women.
>> Both were brunettes and cars were red.
>> Will keep my eyes open for the blonde in blue.
>> Regards
>> Mark Farnham
>> S1 2+2
>> Auckland
>>
>> ----------
>> > From: grant@copyland.co.nz
>> > To: e-type@jag-lovers.org
>> > Subject: [E-Type] Calling Auckland New Zealand/humour
>> > Date: Thursday, 11 June 1998 00:23
>> >
>> > A male friend of mine (in Auckland, New Zealand), sent me the
>> following....
>> > it might amuse you...
>> >
>> > "Saw what could be the woman of your dreams this afternoon. Long
blonde
>> > hair,
>> > beautiful looks, a bit like a petite version of Helen Hunt, John Lennon
>> > sunglasses on an overcast day, and driving a deep navy blue E-type!
The
>> > lights changed and I didn't get the number plate."
>> >
>> > now, don't you just hate that :-) .... now, if she's on this list
>> perhaps
>> > she could email me ;-)
>> >
>> > Grant :-)
>> > who doesn't think it matters if the deep navy blue E-type is actually a
>> 2+2
>> > :-)
>>
>
|