| To: | MG Listserver <mgs@Autox.Team.Net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Engine Restraint |
| From: | Chris Attias <cattias@cats.ucsc.edu> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 1998 13:14:16 -0700 |
Listees, This is a trivia question for which I don't have an answer: Why did MG use so many different engine restraint solutions? Different rods, different pins, GTs with no rod at all. I can see where 3 synchro and 4 synchro might be somewhat different, but why did GTs rely on engine mount brackets/no rod? Chris Attias '64 B '68 B-GT |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | aluminum hoods(bonnets) and trunk lids(boots), Howard Young |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | reducing collection, CHARLES JOINER |
| Previous by Thread: | aluminum hoods(bonnets) and trunk lids(boots), Howard Young |
| Next by Thread: | reducing collection, CHARLES JOINER |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |