At 12:53 PM 1/1/98 -0800, you wrote:
>I invite anyone who prefers the rubber bumper B to the chrome bumper to
>test drive my 1964 B with app. 95 stock HP and then my 1980 MGBLE with
>app. 60 HP(after a good tune up!). Then extol the virtues of that rubber
>bumpered B. I love them both but the 64 is a true sports car performance
>wise. The 1980 is a very nice leisurely touring automobile the the SO
>appreciates.
I invite anyone from either side of the debate to really question whether
or not this is worth arguing over. Trying to change one's opinion on a car
by throwing statistics (Chrome has higher resale value, better handling,
etc - Rubber has the Rover engine bay, yadda yadda) really won't work. If
someone is set in their ways, let them be. There's much better things to
discuss than the endless chrome vs. rubber thing.
As for me, I like chrome. I also like rubber. Rubber is more practical for
me right now. To me, a "B" is a "B"
Soapbox off.
BEN RUSET - mailto:bruset@monmouth.com
MG Cars Webring Admin.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
MG Cars Webring - http://www.infi-pos.com/~oasis/mgring
Safety Fast! - http://www.infi-pos.com/~oasis
Crossroads - http://www.monmouth.com/~bruset
|