OK David,
You said that you had proof that Triumph and MG had a conspiracy (sorry I
broke the spell checker) going. Well I have obtained proof (from Pierre
Salinger) that Triumph and VW had a secret deal also. I will set up a
webpage tomorrow about this. Once setup I will email the List and YOU with
address for the page.
What I am talking about is the mysterious resembellence (wrong spelling)
between the TR Linx (TR7 Station wagon wanna be) and the VW Scirrocco.
These car are almost identical and they were produced in the exact same
years.
Either this is Industrial Espionage (where is the dictionary) or they were
partners thru the whole thing.
And yes I do want a Triumph. But MGs will always be better. I could also
tell you I want a Ferrari 550 Marenello and a Porsche 959 but I had better
shut up before David holds a trial and UNSUBSCRIBES me from the list for
TREASON. And then I can blame the whole TR thing on my Uncle, Chuck
Jurgensen, for involving me in Tri@#$hs. He will be the next to go on
trial he owns a few MGs too.
Kai Radicke
And if I am black and blue tomorrow it is because my Girlfriend read the
message below, needless to say she hates MGs (Should I get rid of her
now?). Now if I could figure out why she needs to read my email.
----------
> From: David Deutsch <drded@ix.netcom.com>
> To: Kai Radicke <mowogmg@dynanet.com>
> Cc: mgs@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Real MGs/FORD/Triumphs the true story
> Date: Tuesday, November 12, 1996 4:35 PM
>
> Yo Kai,
> You know something, I was just thinking to myself "what a fine, decent
> young man this sounds like." I was even thinking of introducing you to
> my 15 year old daughter (in a couple of years). For those who do not
> know, Kai is going to be 15 week after next. But now I get this this
> stuff about taking my cars, auctioning me into slavery. Worst of all
> you want to someday own a Triumph? Later for you, David Deutsch
>
> You wrote:
> >
> >David:
> >
> >I still want a TR6 or TR4A and you can't change my mind by
> brainwashing me
> >:-)
> >
> >>and 2nd because it was so ugly they could not sell them
> >
> >How untrue about the TR7, it was the most successful TR of all. It
> sold
> >like 150,000 cars in like 4 years (this says alot about Triumph cars).
> The
> >TR6 sold about 142,000 in 7 years.
> >
> >>That's the truth and given enough time I'll be happy to fabricate
> >> documentation atesting to it.
> >
> >David, you have 48 hours and for every 12 hours after that deadline
> you
> >must give me one of your MGs and when you run out of cars to give me,
> well
> >I will start the bidding on your other assets:-) I will auction off
> >everything you own until I see this documentation. And if you fail to
> do
> >any of the above I will auction you off to a member of the list, maybe
> John
> >Twist needs another employee :-)
> >
> >Kai "drink your Lucasaide" Radicke
> >
> >---------
> >> From: David Deutsch <drded@ix.netcom.com>
> >> To: Kai Radicke <mowogmg@dynanet.com>
> >> Subject: Re: Real MGs/FORD/Triumphs the true story
> >> Date: Monday, November 11, 1996 3:38 PM
> >>
> >> The fact is that Triumphs were alway made for the sole purpose of
> >> marketing MGs. The salesmen would say "well you want a economical
> >> British sports car, MG is it, or there is always that Triumph thing"
>
> >> This is why MGB was basicly the same for 18 years while Triumphs
> kept
> >> getting uglier and uglier. The trick was to make them unatractive
> but
> >> still have people who had little or no taste in automobles buy them.
>
> >> Well went the TR7 was introduced it was the beginning of the end,
> first
> >> because now they were both British Leyland produces and people who
> >> bought triumphs before suddenly realized their cars were truely ugly
>
> >> and 2nd because it was so ugly they could not sell them. Well
> Triumphs
> >> still are around and MG clubs welcome their presents at meets
> because
> >> they still are proof, by comparison, of the beauty of the MG. That's
>
> >> the truth and given enough time I'll be happy to fabricate
> >> documentation atesting to it. Safety Fast
> >>
> >> You wrote:
> >> >
> >> >No comment on this one. Allright maybe one comment:>I think FORD
> >> sucks now matter what car companies it owns, BMW is a good
> >> >owner for MG. FORD has taken the AM DB7 and made it look just like
>
> >> the Jag>XK8, wait maybe they took the XK8 and made it look like the
> >> DB7. Now>imagine if they owned MG and Triumph. Would you MGers
> want
> >> an MG that>looks like a TR, I think not.>
> >> >Kai M. Radicke -
> >> >1966 MGB
> >
> >
>
|