mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

oil consumption & PCV

To: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: oil consumption & PCV
From: Ernest Gilbert <barrister@lawref.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 96 16:21:42 -0700
To anyone on the list besides myself that has an interest in my continuing saga 
of oil consumption. You will recall that the fresh engine in my '67 BGT was 
using about 1 qt per 500 miles, and that the only visible evidence of where it 
was going was exhaust smoke after idling at a stop light. Then when I blew a 
head gasket I found no valve seals in the head.  Thought I had fixed it then.

Well . . . it never really stoped smoking and yesterday the smoke got so bad 
the car could not be driven without fear of green stamps from Broderick. 

I disconnected the NEW PCV and plugged the manifold. No more smoke. Opened the 
PCV and its full of oil. Also discovered oil filler cap not fully secured but 
its a vented cap.

Now the questions.

I understand the PCV to be functioning properly if it opens and supplies 
vacuume to the sump only at higher rpm's, and improperly if it leaks at lower 
rpm's. It would therefore seem that if the oil is getting up the 12 inches or 
so of hose to the PCV when it is bad, it also will when it is good. Is this 
true? Do all engines equiped with PCV's burn some oil at higher rpm's?

Secondly, the Moss catalogue says that the 18GH engines were equiped with only 
a Y connector which fed the sump vent into both air cleaners, and not a PCV 
into the intake mainfold. That I think would cover the '67 and make a PCV 
unnecessary. Is this true?

Currently my engine uses 2 rear A style air filters, the flat ones with a 
screen around the perimeter and no tube for the vent hose. I propose to replace 
these with 2 front A style filters with vent tubes and go to the Y connector. 
Can I be this lucky and legal too?

Ernest
barrister@lawref.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>