To: | <theo.smit@dynastream.com>, <mgb-v8@autox.team.net>, <mgs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LED lights |
From: | Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca> |
Date: | Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:14:16 -0400 |
In-reply-to: | <200610021836.k92Iam204863@red2.dynastream.com> |
References: | <7.0.1.0.0.20061002092718.02074748@look.ca> <200610021836.k92Iam204863@red2.dynastream.com> |
Reply-to: | Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca> |
Sender: | owner-mgb-v8@autox.team.net |
Theo, Damn! Now I know. - Does anyone want my white LEDs ??? At 02:37 PM 10/2/2006, Theo Smit wrote: RegardsPart of the problem with using white LEDs behind a red lens is that modern white LEDs are actually blue, violet or ultraviolet LEDs with a fluorescent slug over top of them. The short-wavelength light from the LED excites the fluorescent material, which then radiates in the visible part of the spectrum, producing 'white' light with a bit of a blue cast to it. Putting that behind a red lens then throws away about 90% of the effective radiation, because the blue light and everything except for the red and nearly-red components will get absorbed by the lens. Pure red LEDs generate red light only, and all of it will pass through the taillight lens, with no wasted energy. Red LEDs will be MUCH better than white LEDs, and they are definitely brighter than the equivalent incandescent bulb especially if you're directly behind them. Best regards, Theo Barrie Barrie Robinson (705) 721-9060 /// /// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list /// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net /// Send list postings to mgb-v8@autox.team.net /// Edit your replies! If they include this trailer, they will NOT be sent. /// |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LED lights, Theo Smit |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LED lights, Barrie Robinson |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LED lights, Theo Smit |
Next by Thread: | Re: LED lights, Barrie Robinson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |