To: | "R. O. Lindsay" <rolindsay@dgrc.com>, "Neil Cotty" <neilc@apphosting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic |
From: | "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net> |
Date: | Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:40:20 -0700 |
Cc: | "'MG Mail list'" <mgs@autox.team.net>, <mgb-v8@autox.team.net> |
In-reply-to: | <3AA5009E.F4B30012@dgrc.com> |
Reply-to: | "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net> |
Sender: | owner-mgb-v8@autox.team.net |
> IF, and that's in caps, the electronic ignition computer has the >advance curve built into it, you should not use the weight driven >centrifugal advance. HOWEVER, most add-on electronic ignitions >are just detection modules to replace the points and need the >advance curve. The Pertronix system is not a computer ignition. It is just a trigger that replaces the points. Larry Hoy /// /// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list /// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net /// Send list postings to mgb-v8@autox.team.net /// Edit your replies! If they include this trailer, they will NOT be sent. /// |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic, Larry Hoy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic, J MILLER |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic, Larry Hoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic, J MILLER |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |