Gregory72@aol.com wrote:
>
> OK
> Not that I want to offend all the folks on the list, but! I figure
> my opinions as good as anyone else's... at least as far as it goes. So...
> before I drop my it on the group, I'll say, I've had the priveledge of
> visiting Australia and all points south of the souther hemisphere and all...
> that! So.... Glen, my opinion of of the 300 rods differs from yours. In a
> car like the Olds F85, I'd think they'd be all right. Given that they'd
> probably not see the shady side of 4900 RPM. Any arguments?
>
> Greg
Greg, What GOOD is the 300 rod going to do????? That is only going to
turn 4900 r p m ???? It is heaver than the stock rod ( that I turn 7000
R.P.M.) & you will have to add mallory to the crank to get it to
ballance out & you will still only have a 3900 motor!!! There are .020
over 3900 rover pistons that I can get that will do the job & turn 6000
r p m Glenn
|