To: | Kai Radicke <mowogmg@pil.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Stag Engine (was: Rover V8 prices...) |
From: | Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Nov 1998 20:16:57 +0000 |
Cc: | Robbie Anderson <Robbie@rie.net.au>, MGB-V8 List <mgb-v8@Autox.Team.Net> |
Organization: | I.T. Answers Ltd |
References: | <001701be1616$c7e7c760$a6a508cf@kairadic> |
Reply-to: | Paul Hunt <paul.hunt1@virgin.net> |
Sender: | owner-mgb-v8@Autox.Team.Net |
This was a common conversion, in the UK at least, due to the problems with the Stag engine. The conversion usually necessitated bonnet louvres. PaulH. Kai Radicke wrote: > > >I know it sounds like nit-picking but a stag V8 is actually closer to two > >triumph four cylinder blocks, joined at the waist at birth. It is not a > rover V8. > > You're correct, as someone mentioned to me earlier. I was recalling a > particular Stag, that I see at the local LBC shop often, which does have a > RoverV8 and just made the assumption (without looking into it) that this was > correct. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Engine wts and fast Fords, DANMAS |
---|---|
Next by Date: | New seats for the "B"- from a Miata Purists please delete immediately!, Jim Stuart |
Previous by Thread: | Stag Engine (was: Rover V8 prices...), Kai Radicke |
Next by Thread: | RE: Rover 8 vs. ?, KILE, PAUL D |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |