Mayf
I think that is an excellent evaluation of the rule. Were I
responsible for that rule, I would eagerly solicit your input.
That rule, as currently written, says you must restrict lateral
head movement in a way that will be antiquate to us.
That does not give me a warm feeling.
Bryan
drmayf wrote:
> I had previously looked throught he changes to the rules and today
> downloaded the final changes. One particular one seems to me to need
> some additional discusson. It is a good rule abut the words need some
> additional comments. That is the one regarding the driver's helmet
> support. Here is the part that is odd to me:
>
> " Lateral movement: The/* structure*/ shall provide restriction to
> lateral head movement of less than 2" per side by January 1, 2008. See
> Section 3.B.1"
>
> I am not tring to be picky here but the use of the word /*structure*/
> means, at least to me, the roll cage itself. Not the padding.
> /*Structure is load carrying*/ while the padding carries no loads.
> Padding only limits the applied force. So if /*structure*/ is the
> correct word then less than 2 inches from the roll cage and add SFI
> padding to that and we are restricted to maybe an inch or less side
> movement. Is that good? Seems like we need to be able to move our heads
> around some.
>
> Who should I contact to get a reading on this?
>
> Next, and this one is picky, lol... The same rule says this must be
> implemented by January 1, 2008. Don't we really mean the rule is in
> effect on January 1, 2008? I suspect that cars will be being modified to
> meet lateral movement rule right up until first meet time and certainly
> not by January 1, 2008.
>
> And finally, if we are bing so specific as to the wording on the
> limiting of head movement, what is going to be used to measure it? Are
> all drivers including alternate drivers going to be required at the
> first attending meet to get in the car and some sort of gage used to
> measure on both sides at once? Will 2.1 inches be allowed? How about
> 2.05"? The question is how will this actually be measured and when? And
> what about an alternate driver who may be smaller in stature and the
> helmet is smaller? The /*structure*/ part of the rule is violated here
> if it may made to meet the minimum of a larger helmet.
>
> Seems to me that the quoted rule should have said padding may be used to
> limit the lateral head movement to less that 2 inches of free travel.
> And padding is any roll bar padding but if just the normal roll cage
> stuff must be used in conjunction with the sfi stuff.
>
>
> As I mentioned, this is a good rule but it is goping to be hard to apply
> and keep track of and inspect.
>
> Can we get some solid discussion from any of the rules folk in this?
> Stuff that will be binding?
>
> mayf.
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Land-speed mailing list
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/land-speed
|