To: | "Skip Higginbotham" <Saltrat@lubricationdynamics.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Hans Device |
From: | "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net> |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:40:35 -0700 |
Fascinating thread.......... Just an engineer's viewpoint here. Keep in mind that the compressed gas in an air cylinder will have a lot of "spring" and likely not much dampening. Different than a liquid shock absorber that is virtually all dampening. Exactly what combination of the two likely will depend on the travel distance and how frequently you hit the "bumps". Same general theory as an auto suspension; but the "roadway" is a bit less predictable. I wonder whether there's available any well reduced crash dummy data from auto industry tests......"G" loadings and stuff like that. Not that we amateurs ought to be engineering this this hardware ourselves. I wouldn't be real interested in the testing phase...... Ed Weldon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Skip Higginbotham" <Saltrat@lubricationdynamics.com> Subject: RE: Hans Device > Good idea Neil....how about air cylinders. They are lighter and > ........well think of a door closer. How would you hook it up? > Skip > >I wonder if the straps could be replaced with a couple of small valved > >hydraulic cylinders. These "shock absorbers" would let a driver move his > >head but they would resist sudden movement forward such as in a crash. > >They would be velocity- sensitive and provide damping. Has anyone ever > >explored this idea?.........Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Motorcycle Re: Hans Device, Dick J |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Landspeed head restraints1, Wester Potter |
Previous by Thread: | Hans Device, Dick J |
Next by Thread: | RE: Hans Device, Dick J |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |