land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hans Device

To: joseph lance <jolylance@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Hans Device
From: Doug Odom <dlodom@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:52:16 -0700
They hit a wall with the front of the car. You would have to drive a 
long way at Bonneville to hit a wall.
 Doug Odom in big ditch

joseph lance wrote:

> But it's the snap of the head FORWARD due to a high front impact G 
> load that killed Dale E. and Scott Brayton, They might of lived if 
> they were wearing a Hans device. Back and side restraints for the head 
> aren't enough for that kind of impact.
>
> Lance
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick J" <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
> To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 11:31 PM
> Subject: Hans Device
>
>
>> It seems to me that since head mobility is not an issue in an LSR car 
>> (no need to look around), then a Hans device is a stopgap measure to 
>> something that could just be built into the car.  Why not just have a 
>> seat and head support that does the job without a snap in restraint 
>> attached to the helmet?  If you are totally supported, back and 
>> sides, by a well fitting seat and headrest which is incapsuled in a 
>> good cage, then there should be no need for a Hans device.
>>
>>  DickJ
>>  In east Texas




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>