land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Fwd: Bonneville Rear Engine Roadsters

To: land-speed@autox.team.net
Subject: Fwd: Bonneville Rear Engine Roadsters
From: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:30:09 EDT
Return-path: <ARDUNDOUG@aol.com>
From: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com
Full-name: ARDUN DOUG
Message-ID: <105.4e4bb044.2e538c77@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:29:43 EDT
Subject: Re: Bonneville Rear Engine Roadsters
To: v4gr@rcn.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6032
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.99d.1
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain

In a message dated 8/17/2004 8:28:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time, v4gr@rcn.com 
writes:

> Now I ask you, do you think Harry's body really is a model T? Neither do I.
> It's a specialty constructed body for landspeed racing. It happens to have
> lines resembling a model T but it's not got one Ford part on it. So why
> isn't it a legal lakester?         Rich Fox
> 

Rich,
    I agree completely. The guys who built rear-engine modified roadsters 
when there was no class for them seem to be hoping that if they show up with 3 
or 
more cars SCTA will eventually relent and create a new class.
    As the owner of a conventional front-engine modified roadster I must 
admit to being biased, but I feel that the rear-engine modified roadster has 
some 
inherent aerodynamic advantages, such as fairing the roll cage and chute pack, 
that are the main challenge in making a front-engine modified roadster 
aerodynamic............Ardun Doug King






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>