To: | land-speed@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Traction control II |
From: | "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> |
Date: | Sun, 21 Dec 2003 08:58:00 -0500 |
Then we are in agreement the definition of traction control is very vague at best. Of all people I had hoped that you would know the difference more than anyone because as far as I know you are in the auto repair business. What is your definition of it so we are on the same page? I have a 2002 Pontiac Grand Prix with traction control. It operates the brakes to slow down a spinning wheel but only that wheel. I snows in Connecticut. I have tested it a lot. Never once did the engine get soft or lay down. Can you imagine how much money GM could save if they did it with electronics only to control the engine rather than the brakes? they could eliminate 4 wheel speed sensors 4 pickup wheels, the brake actuator and the computer than runs this mess. If Davis says that their device is that small it could probably be made in large quantities (millions) for around 10 or 20 bucks.. less than the price of a couple wheel speed sensors at the same quantity level. At some point in time some magazine writer or advertising idiot started calling things that help stop the wheels from spinning by cutting power traction control. I assume it was one of those types as they are responsible for most of the mis-information in the world. They probably reasoned that it was traction control because the wheels stopped spinning. They did forget to notice the car slowed down as well. While cutting power will stop a wheel from spinning by having no more power than the wheels will hook up if this were in a passenger car with an open diff on an icy road I doubt if the car would move at all. If the same car had a proper traction control system it would drive away with no fuss as it would only slow down a spinning wheel and let the others drive the car. The real problem with traction control is the definition that has been expanded to cover anything that will help hook the car up. Even worse is the adoption of this definition by people and organizations that do not seem to know what they are talking about but assume if this person calls this thing traction control than it must be so. It is sort of like looking something up on the net. The information is no more accurate than the person that wrote it. Dave.. At least this subject is helping my typing skills.. LOL |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Traction control II, John Goodman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Traction Control, docb8532 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Traction control II, John Goodman |
Next by Thread: | Re: Traction control II, Nt788 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |