land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

The Real Difference: Hemi vs Ford & Chev

To: land-speed@autox.team.net
Subject: The Real Difference: Hemi vs Ford & Chev
From: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 16:31:50 -0800 (PST)
Specifically, I was comparing intake flow of a
stock 1955 Chrysler 354 hemi and a ported
Chrysler 354 hemi with some figures I had in a
magazine for common SBC GM and aftermarket heads.
 I found that the old hemi outflowed any of the
heads listed in the article I had. I can't find
the magazine with the SBC numbers as I have just
boxed up a bunch of magazines in my annual
cleanup to make room for new Christmas
subscriptions.  If anybody has flow numbers for
SBC though, I would like to compare them with the
old hemi.  Here's what the 1955 Chrysler hemi
flowed at 28 inches:
.200 lift  121 stock   125 ported
.300 lift  178 stock   200 ported
.400 lift  212 stock   261 ported
.500 lift  225 stock   287 ported
.600 lift  233 stock   313 ported
.700 lift              416 ported (modified for
racing)

Personally, I think those numbers look pretty
good, even today.  Does anybody have any numbers
on any SBC that flows more than that?  Most
old-time hemi guys felt that the smaller Desoto
flowed even better than the Chrysler, because the
ports were straighter.  I dunno, my motors are
all nearly stock, but I still love every rusted
bolt in them!

Dick J   

///
///  land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe land-speed
///
///  or go to  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>