land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tire reliabilty, and traction control

To: "rtmack" <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>,
Subject: Re: Tire reliabilty, and traction control
From: "glen barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 11:46:20 -0800
Regarding the lakester with some cord and blistering showing. The question
is was this one run or several runs on the tires. Over the years I have seen
many tires with this condition and even know for a fact that Al Teague has
trimmed off a few strands of cord with a razor blade to make a high speed
return run.Some times all it not what it seems.
Glen
----- Original Message -----
From: "rtmack" <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
To: "Skip Higginbotham" <saltrat@pro-blend.com>
Cc: "rtmack" <RTMACK@concentric.net>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: Tire reliabilty, and traction control


> Skip:
> There may be some cases of tire failure that are purely a function of
overload--
> God knows some of our racers manage to load the hell out of them.  But you
were the
> first one who told me (before I had ever turned a wrench on "the Rose")
that many
> of the fastest LSR cars had to deal with about "15% wheelspin".  I don't
understand
> why you are saying something different now.  And based on my own
examination (and,
> admittedly marginal expertise)-- I believe that the drive tires on the
very fast
> lakester pitted near us showed evidence of spinning.  There were abrasion
marks,
> for one thing-- and some cord showing through where the surface had
abraded away.
> Abrasion marks come from spinning the tires.  There was also a little
blistering,
> and bare places where it appeared that blisters had popped-off.  As you
know,
> blisters come from heat.  Heat (usually) comes from spinning the tires.
We know
> that that car seems to have the ability to really load the drive tires--
so
> overload may have been a contributing factor (as it may have been in Earl
Wooden's
> case)-- but seeing the tire abraded down to the cord suggests to me that
the main
> factor is probably wheelspin.
> Yes, it would be better to get the opinion of a real expert, rather than
just
> exchanging opposing hot rodder opinions.  Shouldn't be hard to find
someone with
> sufficient expertise in tire failure modes and  post-failure analysis.  I
probably
> bump into one or two at any CART race I work.  Can we get a representative
sample
> of  (recently) failed tire carcasses?  If so, I would be willing to try to
recruit
> an appropriate expert to our cause.
>
> There is nothing here that I see as a valid arguement why racers in
non-vintage
> classes should not be allowed to use TC, if they want to.
> Russ
>
>
> Skip Higginbotham wrote:
>
> > Russ,
> > So how about some failure analysis? How can we do that? Others have had
> > tire failures that have not gone 300 even....this year....on new tires.
> > Excessive loading and load deflection? I think it is a real possibility
> > that needs proving or disproving. I think we will find little or no tire
> > slippage and yet tires coming apart. How about it?
> > Skip

///
///  land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe land-speed
///
///  or go to  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>