To: | "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Re: Rear Engine Ts] |
From: | Phillip Landry <saltracer@netscape.net> |
Date: | 4 Jan 01 05:43:52 PST |
I agree with Dan. There are plenty of classes now and with the possible addition of the Nostalgia(?) classes I think most people can find a place for the car they currently have or want to build. Phil "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com> wrote: Roadsters run in a category called Vintage. Some of the mails posted seem to want to keep the classic lakes cars in tact. If we build long wheelbase, rear engine roadsters similar to a Top Fuel or Fed Mogal(sp) car where is the classic look? The answer would seem to be to build 'em like they were. Then the handling problem would return. Vintage is for the classic car - if you want to build a rear engine lakester then run in lakester class. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Rear Engine T's, Dan Warner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor........., Dave Dahlgren |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor........., Dave Dahlgren |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Re: Rear Engine Ts], Phillip Landry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |