Kind of simple.. makes more power more reliable, can put the engine
lower in the car, more stable oil temps, not subject to almost any
g-forces in any direction... An 'accusump' is mostly a band aid in my
humble opinion. I can not think of too many real race cars that use them
but am sure there must be more than one also..
Dahlgren
EMS
Chuck Rothfuss wrote:
>
> Tom, List,
>
> I'm sure the folks at Muscle Motorsports <www.musclemotorsports.com> (Used
> NASCAR type parts) could find something durable for a small block Chevy
> application. Why the dry sump route? I have a hard time finding space for
> an oil cooler on my car, so I have to wonder if mounting the tanks isn't
> gonna be a problem. I see lots of Accusump systems out there, to make sure
> things stay lubricated. I had called Muscle Motorsports to see if they had
> any small Accusump systems. They said "Sure, we've got some little FIVE
> GALLON ones!" Any dry sump/Accusump users out there to discuss pros/cons
> and relative expense of these systems?
>
> Chuck "5 Gallon fuel cell, 5 Quart oil pan" Rothfuss
> Pole Cat Hollow, NC
>
>
> At 11:48 PM 3/3/2000 EST, Tom Stewart wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >I'm considering converting my small block Chevy Monza to a Dry sump system.
> >Having no experience with this stuff I would like any advice I can get. My
> >main questions are-- How big a tank should I use? , 3 stage or 4 stage? And
> >what are the main mods to the block? Any parts sources would be great too.
> >Thanks,
> >Tom Stewart B/pro Monza
> >San Luis Obispo CA
> >
> >
|