I've seen a few cars with the two tone extended to the rear of the fender
(sorry wing) with varying results. It has to be tough to get the right line
without the swage.
Bill Lawrence
________________________________
From: Steven Kingsbury <airtightproductions at icloud.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 10:10:58 PM
To: WILLIAM B LAWRENCE
Cc: Bob Spidell; healeys at autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Fwd: 1956 Austin-Healey 100M
I remember talking with Gerry Coker about this in an interview I did with him.
He also told me about the design of bringing the swage line past the rear wheel
opening. He thought it should end at the opening, but since folks wanted to two
tone the cars and needed a line to follow, Donald asked him to continue the
line and send his suggestions to the body makers. And the rest as they say, is
history. But if you notice the early cars do not have a swage line that flows
past the rear wheel opening.
S
On Aug 02, 2018, at 02:11 PM, WILLIAM B LAWRENCE <ynotink at msn.com> wrote:
Steven,
If you have a copy of the Austin Healey 100 service manual take a look at the
very first factory illustration on page iii. It shows the correct installation.
The story is that Gerry Coker was looking for a detail to break the slab sided
aspect of the car by emphasizing the sweep of the swage line to enhance the
overall design. He found the shape he wanted by breaking one of his long,
narrow pen nibs in half and using that for his model. To place the blunt end of
the spear forward would be counter to the overall aesthetic he was looking for.
I think of it as an arrow or a spear in flight.
My opinion, but evidently the manufacturer's also.
Bill Lawrence
________________________________
From: Healeys <healeys-bounces at autox.team.net> on behalf of Steven Kingsbury
<airtightproductions at icloud.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 2:57:49 AM
To: Bob Spidell
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Fwd: 1956 Austin-Healey 100M
Bob, you think the spears are correct on this car? Really? And you're so
detailed on your other comments. I don't want to come off as a know it all,
because I know very little about these cars, but every factory photo I've ever
seen of an Austin Healey doesn't match with this photo from Hyman's car.
Steven
On Aug 01, 2018, at 06:55 PM, Bob Spidell <bspidell at comcast.net> wrote:
No, the wing spears are correct.
If you are having trouble viewing this message, CLICK
HERE.<http://www.icontact-archive.com/5jTcF_lnvVpG0xR-n_cjBQWo26LNyjjy?w=4>
[http://staticapp.icpsc.com/icp/loadimage.php/mogile/1598648/3cfd035f884d7cd8f224fb10cb6fb58c/image/jpeg]<http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=24559035&msgid=123600&act=R41R&c=1598648&destination=https%3A%2F%2Fhymanltd.com%2F%3Futm_source%3Deblast%26utm_medium%3Demail>
[https://hymanltd.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/6093-1.jpg]<http://click.icptrack.com/icp/relay.php?r=24559035&msgid=123600&act=R41R&c=1598648&destination=https%3A%2F%2Fhymanltd.com%2Fvehicles%2F6093-1956-austin-healey-100m-roadster%2F%3Futm_source%3Deblast%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campaign%3Dvehicle_6093>
_______________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/healeys/attachments/20180802/9c2bfb4e/attachment.html>
|
