Jack,
I have no dog in this fight because I don't have an MGC, though I do
have an MGB. Your MGC is 9 years newer than your Healey. Are you
saying that even then the Healey wins out? That is amazing to me.
I definitely would say that the Healey is better looking, though the MG
is also a good looking car. I've never heard an MGC that sounds as good
as a Healey. What else?
Thanks.
Charlie
On 4/1/2011 7:37 PM, Jack Feldman wrote:
> In thinking about it, telling Donald Healey that they would like to badge
> the MGC as a Healey must have been done on April 1.
>
> I have both, and the C is just can't compare to the Healey. (Don't let my
> fellow MGC registry members see this.) When someone mentions the suggestion,
> I am temped to list some comparisons between the two.
>
>
> Jack
> 1960 Healey 3000
> 1969 MGC
> 1972 MGBGT
> _______________________________________________
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation $12.75
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
>http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/mgcharlie@comcast.net
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of
mgcharlie.vcf]
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|