AH Spares web site states that machining of the crankshaft and block is
required.
A similar but different seal sold by Moss appears to involve less machining.
Is this correct?
Which of those two seals, or one sold by someone else, does anyone feel is a
better product?
Thanks,
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: healeys-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:healeys-bounces@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Peter Schauss
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 11:58 AM
To: I Erbs
Cc: healey help
Subject: Re: [Healeys] 3000 rear main seal adaptor
I did mine that way. The seal that I bought, from AH Spares, required
removal modification of the
engine rear plate, but I was able to do all of it with the engine in place.
Peter Schauss
1963 BJ7
1980 MGB
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, I Erbs <eyera3@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just wondering... Can the rear main seal update kit be installed in an
> engine in-situ? Or must it be disassembled first? I'm pulling the tranny
and
> that should expose the rear of the engine......
>
> --
> Ira Erbs
> DIGS-4 SOLUTIONS
> IT CONSULTANTS
> Portland, OR
> _______ Austin Healey 3000 _______
> (______ \____1960 BT7____/_______)
> (_________________________)
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/ronald-ray@sbcglobal.net
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|