healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Healey sound

To: <healeys@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Healey sound
From: "Carr&Edwards" <scvc70@epix.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:44:22 -0500
Just goes to show that really smart designers pay attention to details! 
This is the same thing Cecil Kimber did with the early MGs, only he had 
someone drive the car back and forth on the road past him with different 
exhaust systems until he heard one he liked----------

Sarah Carr
BN1 (and various MGs) in PA



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "BJ8 Healeys" <sbyers@ec.rr.com>
To: <healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:28 AM
Subject: [Healeys] Healey sound


>I don't usually read Road & Track, but was browsing the May 2006 issue in 
>the dentist's office recently.  Peter Egan's article was about a visit he 
>made to the Jaguar factory and how they were investing so much effort in 
>their  sound lab to get the sounds of the new XK just right.
> Of course, that made me think of the sound of a Healey and I wondered if 
> any mention would be made of that.  Well, there it was in the second 
> column on page 48:  "On the plane home I got thinking about a passage I'd 
> read in Geoffrey Healey's memoirs about the developmnent of the early 
> Austin-Healey sports cars.  He said that he and his father, Donald, had 
> spent a long weekend at the factory garage, installing different 
> combinations of mufflers, resonators and exhaust pipes on a Healey 100 
> protoype, trying to get the sound just right.  They finally found the 
> magical combination and his father approved it for production."
> "How different an approach this was.  Very seat-of-the pants (appropriate 
> for a former World War I aviator like Donald Healey).  Listen to what you 
> like and then bolt it on there.  No fake heads, microphones, computers or 
> sound-wave printouts.
> On the other hand...the Healey 100-4 exhaust note probably could have been 
> improved.  I spent about 2500 miles touring in one with my buddy Chris 
> Beebe a few years back and I found the sound pleasant, but a bit droning 
> and flat on the highway, missing some sonorous element."
> "Chris, who still owns the car, agrees.  We had lunch the other day and he 
> said, 'The Healey that really got it right was the 3000.  Beautiful sound, 
> one of the best ever.  But the 100-4 isn't quite in the same league.'"
>
> I agree, but that might be my BJ8 bias.  It's good to know that Peter 
> Egan's standard for the right sound is the Healey, though.
>
> Steve Byers
> HBJ8L/36666
> Havelock, NC  USA
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>
> You are subscribed as scvc70@epix.net
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>