--===============1535762713021608919==
boundary="=_22d14b5dcaa6aa2cc87625c63118357e"
--=_22d14b5dcaa6aa2cc87625c63118357e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
format=flowed
This is what I use as well, .002 to .0025. It works.
Henry Frye
2025 Kastner Cup Chair
fot@kastnercup.com
On 2024-11-27 17:03, Steve Yott via Fot wrote:
> .002" -0 + .0005
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Lorne Fritz via Fot <fot@autox.team.net>
> Date: 11/27/24 3:45 PM (GMT-06:00)
> To: fot@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Fot] rod bearing clearances
>
> Hi. What is everyone using for rod bearing clearances on the TR3/4 engines.
> The competition manual says .001 extra. The workshop manual specs. says
> 2.0861 to 2.0866. with a wear limit clearnce of .005. That would me to
> that 2.0801(2.0861 -.005,-.001 0) would be acceptable. What does the group
> think? Thanks in advance. Lorne Fritz
--=_22d14b5dcaa6aa2cc87625c63118357e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=
=3DUTF-8" /></head><body style=3D'font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Gen=
eva,sans-serif'>
<p>This is what I use as well, .002 to .0025. It works. </p>
<p>Henry Frye<br />2025 Kastner Cup Chair<br />fot@kastnercup.com</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p id=3D"v1reply-intro">On 2024-11-27 17:03, Steve Yott via Fot wrote:</p>
<blockquote type=3D"cite" style=3D"padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2=
px solid; margin: 0">
<div id=3D"v1replybody1">
<div dir=3D"auto">
<div dir=3D"auto">.002" -0 + .0005</div>
<div> </div>
<div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-size: 100%; color: #000000;" align=3D"left"=
>
<div>-------- Original message --------</div>
<div>From: Lorne Fritz via Fot <fot@autox.team.net></div>
<div>Date: 11/27/24 3:45 PM (GMT-06:00)</div>
<div>To: fot@autox.team.net</div>
<div>Subject: [Fot] rod bearing clearances</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi. What is everyone using for rod bearing clearance=
s on the TR3/4 engines. The competition manual says .001 extra. =
The workshop manual specs. says 2.0861 to 2.0866. with a wear limit =
clearnce of .005. That would me to that 2.0801(2.0861 -=
=2E005,-.001 0) would be acceptable. What does the group think? =
Thanks in advance. Lorne Fritz</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
--=_22d14b5dcaa6aa2cc87625c63118357e--
--===============1535762713021608919==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Archive: http://autox.team.net/archive http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
--===============1535762713021608919==--
|