fot
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [FOT] FOT Logo: Checkered vs. Debris Flag

To: <N197TR4@cs.com>, <greenman62@hotmail.com>, <triosan@gmail.com>,
Subject: RE: [FOT] FOT Logo: Checkered vs. Debris Flag
From: "Doug Mitchell" <dmitchel@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:37:43 -0400
As a regular corner worker, please be advised that it is no
longer referred to as the Debris flag. For the last five or
so years, it has officially been the Surface flag. This allows
us to be more liberal in its use. Having said that, it seems
even more appropriate since the Triumphs are usually contributing
to the surface condition. Not always with parts!!

Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-fot@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-fot@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of N197TR4@cs.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 2:50 PM
To: greenman62@hotmail.com; triosan@gmail.com; cartravel@pobox.com
Cc: GRMTim@aol.com; fot@autox.team.net
Subject: [FOT] FOT Logo: Checkered vs. Debris Flag


The Checkered Flag (vs. the Debris Flag) was important to me.

I felt that something was needed, in the logo, to honor the Marque and the
People that are involved with them.

I still feel that way.

There is an enormous amount of time and money that goes into these efforts.
The FoT has elevated the desirability and respect of the Triumph in recent
years.

"A return to glory".

Even porsche pilot Vic Elford is more likely to admit he had a factory ride
with Triumph, early in his carrer.

Joe (A)



> Well I can't improve too much on what was written a few years back... I
can
> say it was a joint opinion by Jack and Joe to change the "debris flag" for
> the "checkers." Our favorite crumugeon (Bill Dentinger) lead the counter
> non-revolution to bring back the "debris flag".
>
> In this age of corporate image where having the officail approved anything
> is paramount (or perhaps MGM)... the really-o, truly-o, gosh-a-rooney,
> spot-on OFFISHUL logo is... (wait for it...)
>
> Both





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>