In a message dated 12/2/2005 8:08:44 AM Eastern Standard Time,
Group44TR7@aol.com writes:
I personally believe that it is important
for FOT itself to encourage that cars be prepared to the appropriate SCCA
specification of its original racing era. I am therefore am actually
supportive of
CVRA efforts to keep racing both historically correct and affordable.
ABSOLUTELY!
OK, here's my plan. Get rid of the webers, wazoo ignitions, jap gearboxes &
brakes, fiberglass, etc. Castings should have "Stanpart" on them. Require
carburettor & ignition system type as original. Bodywork & suspension specs as
per period GCR/PCS. Spec DOT tires. Limit engine bore size. Establish &
enforce minimum weight rules. Safety related mods including Southwick (Uncle
Jacks)
RAX & front hubs, aftermarket brake masters, upgraded electrics, etc all OK,
actually encouraged. Component upgrades within model range OK. Allow modern
roll bar/cage design for safety reasons (no quasi tube frames). Wheel
diameter as original, rim width open but must meet bodywork rules ie "no part
of the
tire shall be visible when viewed from above, bla, bla...). Modern seat,
drivers gear, fire suppression system & other safety related equipment
obviously
mandated.
These are just a few points worth considering but they do make a difference.
SCCA has proven that these rules DO work but we've also seen what happens
when those rules become too relaxed. THAT is one of the things that killed
SCCA
Production racing. For the cost of preparing & maintaining a competitive
Prod car, one could buy a Ford or FC. It's ironic that they're trying to get
it
back again with the limited prep class.
I have to admit that, as much as I hate rules in general, I have to agree
that something really needs to be done. I also support those groups that are
trying.
JMHO of course,
Safety FasTR,
Glen
(now CERTAINLY the most unpopular person on the FOT list...)
=== unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net
|