To: | Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: 225hp |
From: | Larry Young <cartravel@pobox.com> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:07:58 -0500 |
I've played with the numbers in the spreadsheet, and I can't get much difference even when the stock length is less. For example, a stock SBC is 5.7, long rods are about 6.2. The arguments about weight and friction are more believable. I already had this spreadsheet laying around. Long ago valve timing was given as piston positions rather than angles. It makes more sense when you think about it. Bill Babcock wrote: >Hey, that's really cool. You're as nuts as I am. Of course right there is >the problem I was talking about. For our engines it doesn't really >matter--you can't get even close to the numbers you need for it to matter. >With short stroke motors and really long rods it makes a small difference >without changing displacement. And in F1 motors (and MotoGP) a tiny >improvement can be the difference between first and second, which is the >difference between winner and first loser. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|