This topic used to cause me brain damage, but long ago,
i too made peace with it.
issue #1. we are denied the advantage of building race motors from
a clean sheet of paper. Our deck height is set. New F1 engines have
rod/stroke ratios of well over 2:1. Few street engines come that way.
V12 Jag is about 2.16. 259 Stude V8 is 2.11 Most are about 1.7 because
they were designed that way for a whole lot of reasons not related to HP
production.
the point is that we are severely limited.
#2 HRM is imho a poor source of race engine science. I seem to remember
a similar article about 5-6 years ago where they did get significant
changes in HP with only rod and piston change. above 5KRPM
i doubt that there is much cam difference, but below 4K there would be
alot of diff since the one advantage of a short rod is its ability to
get a
stopped column of fluid moving better that the long rod. Frankly, in
a
race engine, I can't see this as a plus.
#3 The business with dwell time and rod angle advantage can be best
understood
by those of us who are conceptually impaired ( hell, it took me years
to
understand how "caster made you faster") by making paper dolls.
use some stiff paper to make models of two setups. Make one about
1.5:1
and the other about 6:1. an absurd example often best illustrates
the
concept. the change in dwell time will be noticeable.
#4 Is this "worth the time/money"? Maybe we will find out, especially if
someone
really goes whole hog with modern short compression distance pistons
so
the longest rod possible gets squeezed in.
art d
|