You've got a great point Joe. From the few messages including mine we are
seemingly approaching a "rules" segment and that is NOT GOOD. Why not just
back up a few days and start over with what is fair and reasonable and without
a lot of new rules. The "Keep it Simple" edict is still worth remembering. I
am only interested in supporting the FOT with a little award annually.
----- Original Message -----
From: N197TR4@cs.com
To: gasket.works@gte.net ; kaskas@cox.net ; rkramer3@austin.rr.com ;
TRDOCTOR@aol.com ; cartravel@pobox.com ; BillB@bnj.com ;
grandwazoo@earthlink.net
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: West....
I am trying to promote the idea of more than one event for FoT in any given
year. Thus.....
Given all the recent conversations and considering all factors without going
into blatantly boring detail, I see opportunities to support these in 2006:
Hallet: I know that this will be a great event, mainly because it is about
PEOPLE.
Portland: Bill Babcock is high on a Labor Day Weekend event, there, and it
deserves support.
BeaverRun: is a Mike Jackson event and so is VIR. I'd like to support one of
those.
(Mosport is always a consideration, but it has been done a couple of time in
recent history)
A couple of more thoughts:
BTW, if Kas sees a "Central Region" for defining the Cup Presentations,
would time zones be a good line of demarcation?
Does the recipient's address or the location of the track determine
eligibility?
I hope we dont end up with too many rules on this. :-)
Joe Alexander
How about Portland or such...
Thunderhill (california)- I'm told that this track is simply outstanding.
If anyone has seen this track speak up...
Infenion (Sears point) if CSRG were to get involved. More technical than
Laguna in my opinion.
Laguna is less likely but, possible through SCCA as they have (vintage)
dates there. The "cork screw" is always a blast -fast track lots of
history... technically easy though save for that one turn.
these are all WEST as you can go save for Hawaii or Alaska.
|