fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Roll bar material

To: <portermd@zianet.com>, <Fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Roll bar material
From: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 10:40:22 -0700
  Ued mild steel for years and years and have several that were crash tested
and kept everyone safe and healthy.`
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: <portermd@zianet.com>
  To: <Fot@autox.team.net>
  Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 9:46 PM
  Subject: Re: Roll bar material


  > MARK J WEATHERS writes:
  >
  > > low carbon steel and mild steel and 1020 etc are the same basic thing.
I
  > > have no idea what chrome-moly steel is either but it sounds cool when
you
  > > say it.
  >
  > Sounds like a need for a terminology post.  You're correct that
low-carbon
  > steel, mild steel and 1020 are roughly the same thing. But, 1020 is a
  > specific grade of mild steel, just as 1010 and 1012 are. The 1000 series
is
  > composed of all low-carbon, malleable steels, with slightly varying
amounts
  > of carbon and alloying elements.
  >
  > "Chrome-moly" steel is usually the term for AISI 4130, although it can
also
  > mean 4140. Ask for chrome-moly tubing and you'll likely get 4130, since
4140
  > is normally used not for tubing (doesn't draw quite as well as 4130) but
is
  > used in billet form for cranks, etc.
  >
  > ERW stands for electric resistance welded.  This grade is probably
  > permissible under some rules for roll bars, but will probably require a
  > thicker wall to meet the rules than seamless. Seamless, of course, is
  > considerable more expensive. If you can't afford the weight, check the
rules
  > and see if a lighter wall seamless is equivalent to a heavier wall ERW.
ERW
  > is rolled and the seam electrically welded--therefore, it's not quite as
  > strong as seamless, if all other specifications are the same.
  >
  > I may have mentioned previously that while the rules may allow 4130 for
roll
  > bars, it's not recommended, for a couple of reasons. Because of the
  > extremely low elongation of the material, the difference between the
points
  > of yield and failure is small--that means that if it fails, it doesn't
bend
  > much--it snaps. Pieces of it can break loose and become spears. Not
  > something I'd like in a roll cage. The other detriment in fabrication is
  > that the material work-hardens with welding, and requires rather uniform
and
  > precise annealing for at least a foot each direction from each weld.
  > Difficult to do with a large piece such as a roll bar or cage, and
  > especially so if some of the welding has to occur in the car.
  >
  > Mild steel, because of its malleability, yields much more easily, but it
  > doesn't fail catastrophically--it gives, bends, bends some more, all the
  > while absorbing energy. It welds easily and doesn't require extensive
  > annealing because it doesn't have enough carbon in it to noticeably
  > work-harden.
  >
  > Cheers.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>