Irv replied:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Herald948@aol.com (Andy Mace)>
> >
> > Maybe I shouldn't even mention this, but we (VTR) did actually lose a
> member
> > because of Irv's overalls. Said person wrote us a letter, expressing great
> > indignation over our (VTR) choice to bash another fine British marque
> (which
> > it is, of course) in such fashion and proclaiming his intent not to renew.
> > This after our magazine editor had the AUDACITY to print a photo of Irv in
> > those coveralls (TVT #71, Spring 1999, p. 1615) Yes, he owned both and MG
> and
> > a Triumph.
>
> Andy,
>
> VTR should be grateful to me for helping to cull that weakling out of the
> VTR herd and thereby making the rest of VTR stronger. In fact, the guy that
> quit was from Portland, OR, so I made sure I wore my coveralls at VTR again
> last August. I guess I'm just a trouble maker.
>
> ;-)
>
> Irv
I agree with Irv.
If we lost one member because of the fun aspect of being
Triumph owners (vs MG owners) then so be it. Life is
too short to try and please everyone.
Cheers, and is it really the end of the millenium this
time?
Bill Sohl
|