chapman-era
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[10]: Lotus Blasphemy?...

To: lotus-cars@lists.best.com, "Tony Clark" <lotus.tony@airmail.net>
Subject: Re[10]: Lotus Blasphemy?...
From: rebean@CCGATE.HAC.COM
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 97 11:02:12 PST8
     Steve, you did ask for more input, did you not?  :->
     
     Some day, I want to talk to you after I've been able to demonstrate 
     this to you.  It will give us a whole new dimension to talk about (put 
     it in context, so to speak).
     
     Rod


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re[8]: Lotus Blasphemy?...
Author:  "Tony  Clark" <lotus.tony@airmail.net> at CCGATE
Date:    12/15/97 10:32 AM


     
I wrote:
     
> > These are the patches from the front
> wheels of a front wheel drive car in the 
> same corner which must transmit
> steering forces AND driving forces and, 
> *all other things equal*, are forced to 
> assume heroic slip angles which cause
> loss of adhesion, and running off the road 
> and into trees! <
     
Steve did an "ah ha!"
     
> Tony, thank you for your lucid explanation. At this point 
may I remind
> you that one of the M100s attributes is grip, grip, grip to 
obviate this
> effect. Those Lotus guys ain't stupid you know!
     
I now counsel:  ;)
     
The M100 must have fantastic grip and has been called by 
those I respect, "the best handling FWD production car".  But 
sorry;
     
Under my "all other things equal" parameter (a great handling 
RWD car as well) the "equal tires" of the RWD car would 
maintain a "comfort zone" of performance at a cornering speed 
which would set the FWD car's front tires on fire!    The 
designers of near every successful purpose-built race car must 
not be stupid either. 
     
Tony
(Steve, I saved you some Abbot Ale from my "shop raid" you 
had to miss)
     
     
     
     


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>