>
> Fellow fiends:
>
> Regarding the accurate use and derrivation of "bimmers, beemers, etc."
> my only comment is that I hope that the up-and-comming re-evaluation
> of new Rover products (read, MGD) (should such a thing be called
> an LGC?) does not prove to be a **bummer**. ;-)
*** I hope it works out thusly:
BMW continues to make expensive toys for rich folk.
Rover is relegated to a somewhat lower-scale market that BMW does not
presently cover.
The result of this could be a refocusing on ``cheap and cheery'' LBCs.
After all, Mazda has proved that there's still money to be made in that
market, even in the 90s.
Well, I can hope, can't I?
- Jerry
--
***************************************************************
* Jerry Kaidor jerry@tr2.com, jkaidor@synoptics.com *
* KF6VB *
***************************************************************
|