bricklin
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: INTAKE

To: "bricklin" <bricklin@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: INTAKE
From: "High Tech Coatings" <htc@mnsi.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 09:34:24 -0400
I'm glad  I made a mistake and replied direct to the sender and not the
list... I wouldn't want the wrath of the tree huggers on my behind......


> The name of the original poster was stripped out of Stephen's response.
> Whoever first posted about swapping the intake and carb and cutting down
on
> emmissions equipment, this post is directed to you.
>
> ====
> Understandably, as for the emissions thing, no one can advise you to do
> this due to current laws and restrictions.  That you must undertake at
your
> own risk.
> ====
> I'm pretty sure that you can find plenty of people to advise you on how
and
> why to simplify your underhood set-up for more power at the ezpense of the
> old emissions control equipment.  If your car is exempt, then you can
chuck
> everything that doesn't actually help the car's performance or
driveability.
>   eg: everything but the PCV valve and vacuum advance...  I haven't looked
> hard at what's on the '75 351 because I yanked mine with the intention of
> replacing it entirely with something else.
>
> But if you're replacing the intake and carb, that should give you an
> opportunity to do some serious clean-up.
>
> And BTW - there are *plenty* of people who will happily advise you to do
> illegal or socially irresponsible things.  Once you get the car together,
I
> personally advise you to drive the thing around at 100mph on the highways,
> and do some killer smoky burnouts in town. :)  Note that YOU assume all
> risks associated with following this advice. :)
>
> Good luck,
> --
> Phil Martin
> "I don't know what I'm to say,
> But I'll say it anyway."

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/bricklin


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>