ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New Solo 2 Officers for 2005 and change to Street

To: ba-autox@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: New Solo 2 Officers for 2005 and change to Street
From: jake@codeworm.com
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:29:17 -0800
> does it  matter whether you get fourth in Street TIre or sixth some other
> class?

First, you get a trophy for finishing 4th in Street Tire, and you DON'T for 
finishing 6th in some other class.  That matters to a lot of us.  
Second, if you look at the SM car that WAS competitive enough to trophy last 
season in Street Tire and see how it's prepared relative to what 
it's PAX allows, and then extrapolate his results to an ACTUALLY prepared SM 
car, I think it's a little bold to say they can't be competitive..  

Nobody has addressed the effect this will have on race tire use in Stock 
classes.  Does the club care that there's almost no incentive to buy 
race tires now?  Why not simply scrap the race tire option for Stock classes 
all together?  That way we won't dilute the existing smallish Stock 
classes into absurdly small classes.

"Modest Proposal" time:  Street Tire is a "convenience class" because there are 
no race tires.. Why not make them all "convenient".  From this 
standpoint it makes more sense to have a single PAXed class for Stock cars on 
RACE TIRES for those people serious about Nationals.  They 
can compete amongst themselves with a much more tightly controlled set of tire 
variables.  Those of us who do it to compete locally can do 
just that with less expense and hassle, and without the reduced class sizes 
that a have/have-not class structure will create.  A PAXed race tire 
class is bound to have a much more consistent participation since you have to 
be pretty serious to want to get into it, and that's going to 
ease group size problems.  

If you're going to scrap race tires, scrap race tires.

Jake






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>